Nokia C5 vs Xolo LT900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightC5: 50.7 g lighterC5: 89.3 g · LT900: 140 g
• WidthC5: 20 mm narrowerC5: 46 mm · LT900: 66 mm
• Screen diagonalC5: 2.1 in smaller diagonalC5: 2.2 in · LT900: 4.3 in
• DepthLT900: 2.5 mm thinnerLT900: 9.8 mm · C5: 12.3 mm
• HeightC5: 16.7 mm shorterC5: 112 mm · LT900: 128.7 mm
• Release year2010 / 2013C5: 2010 · LT900: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. C5

   Height

   112 mm

   Width

   46 mm

   Depth

   12.3 mm+2.5 mm versus LT900

   Weight

   89.3 g

2. 2. LT900

   Height

   128.7 mm+16.7 mm versus C5

   Width

   66 mm+20 mm versus C5

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   140 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. C5 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. LT900 4.3 in · 16:9 About 51 cm² rectangular area

LT900 has approximately 240.1% more rectangular screen area than C5.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.