Nokia E50 vs O2 Xphone IIm

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE50: 3.5 mm narrowerE50: 43.5 mm · Xphone IIm: 47 mm
• DepthE50: 3.5 mm thinnerE50: 15.5 mm · Xphone IIm: 19 mm
• HeightXphone IIm: 6 mm shorterXphone IIm: 107 mm · E50: 113 mm
• Release year2006 / 2005E50: 2006 · Xphone IIm: 2005

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E50

   Height

   113 mm+6 mm versus Xphone IIm

   Width

   43.5 mm

   Depth

   15.5 mm

   Weight

   104 g

2. 2. Xphone IIm

   Height

   107 mm

   Width

   47 mm+3.5 mm versus E50

   Depth

   19 mm+3.5 mm versus E50

   Weight

   106 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. E50 2.1 in · 4:3 About 13.7 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Xphone IIm Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.