Nokia E52 vs T-Mobile MDA Compact V

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE52: 19 g lighterE52: 98 g · MDA Compact V: 117 g
• WidthE52: 4.1 mm narrowerE52: 49 mm · MDA Compact V: 53.1 mm
• Screen diagonalE52: 0.8 in smaller diagonalE52: 2.4 in · MDA Compact V: 3.2 in
• DepthE52: 3.8 mm thinnerE52: 9.9 mm · MDA Compact V: 13.7 mm
• HeightMDA Compact V: 8.1 mm shorterMDA Compact V: 107.9 mm · E52: 116 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E52

   Height

   116 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   9.9 mm

   Weight

   98 g

2. 2. MDA Compact V

   Height

   107.9 mm

   Width

   53.1 mm

   Depth

   13.7 mm

   Weight

   117 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.