Nokia E52 vs Wiko Ridge 4G

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE52: 27 g lighterE52: 98 g · Ridge 4G: 125 g
• WidthE52: 23 mm narrowerE52: 49 mm · Ridge 4G: 72 mm
• Screen diagonalE52: 2.6 in smaller diagonalE52: 2.4 in · Ridge 4G: 5 in
• DepthRidge 4G: 2.4 mm thinnerRidge 4G: 7.5 mm · E52: 9.9 mm
• HeightE52: 27 mm shorterE52: 116 mm · Ridge 4G: 143 mm
• Release year2009 / 2015E52: 2009 · Ridge 4G: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E52

   Height

   116 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   9.9 mm+2.4 mm versus Ridge 4G

   Weight

   98 g

2. 2. Ridge 4G

   Height

   143 mm+27 mm versus E52

   Width

   72 mm+23 mm versus E52

   Depth

   7.5 mm

   Weight

   125 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E52 2.4 in · 4:3 About 17.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Ridge 4G 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Ridge 4G has approximately 286.4% more rectangular screen area than E52.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.