Nokia E60 vs Samsung Galaxy S2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE60: 17.1 mm narrowerE60: 49 mm · Galaxy S2: 66.1 mm
• Screen diagonalE60: 2.2 in smaller diagonalE60: 2.1 in · Galaxy S2: 4.3 in
• DepthGalaxy S2: 8.5 mm thinnerGalaxy S2: 8.5 mm · E60: 17 mm
• HeightE60: 10.3 mm shorterE60: 115 mm · Galaxy S2: 125.3 mm
• Release year2005 / 2011E60: 2005 · Galaxy S2: 2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E60

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   17 mm+8.5 mm versus Galaxy S2

   Weight

   117 g

2. 2. Galaxy S2

   Height

   125.3 mm+10.3 mm versus E60

   Width

   66.1 mm+17.1 mm versus E60

   Depth

   8.5 mm

   Weight

   116 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. E60 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting
2. 2. Galaxy S2 4.3 in · 5:3 About 52.6 cm² rectangular area

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.