Nokia E60 vs Samsung i300x

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Widthi300x: 1 mm narroweri300x: 48 mm · E60: 49 mm
• DepthE60: 3 mm thinnerE60: 17 mm · i300x: 20 mm
• Heighti300x: 2 mm shorteri300x: 113 mm · E60: 115 mm
• Release year2005 / 2006E60: 2005 · i300x: 2006

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E60

   Height

   115 mm+2 mm versus i300x

   Width

   49 mm+1 mm versus i300x

   Depth

   17 mm

   Weight

   117 g

2. 2. i300x

   Height

   113 mm

   Width

   48 mm

   Depth

   20 mm+3 mm versus E60

   Weight

   121 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. E60 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting
2. 2. i300x 2 in · 4:3 About 12.4 cm² rectangular area

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.