Nokia E61 vs Yezz Andy 3.5EH

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Yezz Andy 3.5EH is 29 g lighter than Nokia E61.

  Nokia E61 — Weight: 144 g. Yezz Andy 3.5EH — Weight: 115 g.

• Width

  Yezz Andy 3.5EH is 7.7 mm narrower than Nokia E61.

  Nokia E61 — Width: 69.7 mm. Yezz Andy 3.5EH — Width: 62 mm.

• Screen diagonal

  The screen diagonal of Nokia E61 is 0.6 in smaller than that of Yezz Andy 3.5EH.

  Nokia E61 — Screen diagonal: 2.9 in. Yezz Andy 3.5EH — Screen diagonal: 3.5 in.

• Depth

  Yezz Andy 3.5EH is 1.5 mm thinner than Nokia E61.

  Nokia E61 — Depth: 14 mm. Yezz Andy 3.5EH — Depth: 12.5 mm.

• Release year

  The recorded release year for Nokia E61 is 2005. The recorded release year for Yezz Andy 3.5EH is 2014.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Nokia E61

   Height:

   117 mm

   Width:

   69.7 mm +7.7 mm versus Yezz Andy 3.5EH

   Depth:

   14 mm +1.5 mm versus Yezz Andy 3.5EH

   Weight:

   144 g

2. 2. Yezz Andy 3.5EH

   Height:

   115.5 mm

   Width:

   62 mm

   Depth:

   12.5 mm

   Weight:

   115 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Nokia E61

   Screen diagonal:

   2.9 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   26 cm²

2. 2. Yezz Andy 3.5EH

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   36.5 cm²

Yezz Andy 3.5EH has approximately 40.1% more rectangular screen area than Nokia E61.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.