Nokia E62 vs Oppo R1 R829T

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonal

  E62: 2.1 in smaller diagonal

  E62:

  2.9 in

  R1 R829T:

  5 in

• Depth

  R1 R829T: 6.9 mm thinner

  E62:

  14 mm

  R1 R829T:

  7.1 mm

• Height

  E62: 25.7 mm shorter

  E62:

  117 mm

  R1 R829T:

  142.7 mm

• Release year

  E62:

  2006

  R1 R829T:

  2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E62

   Height:

   117 mm

   Width:

   69.7 mm

   Depth:

   14 mm +6.9 mm versus R1 R829T

2. 2. R1 R829T

   Height:

   142.7 mm +25.7 mm versus E62

   Width:

   70.4 mm

   Depth:

   7.1 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E62

   Screen diagonal:

   2.9 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   26 cm²

2. 2. R1 R829T

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

R1 R829T has approximately 164.6% more rectangular screen area than E62.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.