Nokia E62 vs Xolo 8X-1020

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE62: 1.6 mm narrowerE62: 69.7 mm · 8X-1020: 71.3 mm
• Screen diagonalE62: 2.1 in smaller diagonalE62: 2.9 in · 8X-1020: 5 in
• Depth8X-1020: 5.2 mm thinner8X-1020: 8.8 mm · E62: 14 mm
• HeightE62: 26 mm shorterE62: 117 mm · 8X-1020: 143 mm
• Release year2006 / 2015E62: 2006 · 8X-1020: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E62

   Height

   117 mm

   Width

   69.7 mm

   Depth

   14 mm+5.2 mm versus 8X-1020

   Weight

   144 g

2. 2. 8X-1020

   Height

   143 mm+26 mm versus E62

   Width

   71.3 mm+1.6 mm versus E62

   Depth

   8.8 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E62 2.9 in · 4:3 About 26 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. 8X-1020 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

8X-1020 has approximately 164.6% more rectangular screen area than E62.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.