Nokia E65 vs Oppo Neo 5s

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE65: 20 g lighterE65: 115 g · Neo 5s: 135 g
• WidthE65: 16.5 mm narrowerE65: 49 mm · Neo 5s: 65.5 mm
• Screen diagonalE65: 2.3 in smaller diagonalE65: 2.2 in · Neo 5s: 4.5 in
• DepthNeo 5s: 7.5 mm thinnerNeo 5s: 8 mm · E65: 15.5 mm
• HeightE65: 26.9 mm shorterE65: 105 mm · Neo 5s: 131.9 mm
• Release year2007 / 2015E65: 2007 · Neo 5s: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E65

   Height

   105 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   15.5 mm+7.5 mm versus Neo 5s

   Weight

   115 g

2. 2. Neo 5s

   Height

   131.9 mm+26.9 mm versus E65

   Width

   65.5 mm+16.5 mm versus E65

   Depth

   8 mm

   Weight

   135 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E65 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Neo 5s 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area

Neo 5s has approximately 272.5% more rectangular screen area than E65.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.