Nokia E65 vs T-Mobile MDA Compact V

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE65: 4.1 mm narrowerE65: 49 mm · MDA Compact V: 53.1 mm
• Screen diagonalE65: 1 in smaller diagonalE65: 2.2 in · MDA Compact V: 3.2 in
• DepthMDA Compact V: 1.8 mm thinnerMDA Compact V: 13.7 mm · E65: 15.5 mm
• HeightE65: 2.9 mm shorterE65: 105 mm · MDA Compact V: 107.9 mm
• Release year2007 / 2009E65: 2007 · MDA Compact V: 2009

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E65

   Height

   105 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   15.5 mm

   Weight

   115 g

2. 2. MDA Compact V

   Height

   107.9 mm

   Width

   53.1 mm

   Depth

   13.7 mm

   Weight

   117 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.