You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.<

Nokia E73 Mode vs ZTE Style Q

Compare recorded specifications, size and practical differences.

ZTE Style Q

ZTE Style Q

Replace Style Q
Remove Style Q
+ Add a third phone

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

  • WeightStyle Q: 27.6 g lighterStyle Q: 100 g · E73 Mode: 127.6 g
  • Screen diagonalE73 Mode: 0.4 in smaller diagonalE73 Mode: 2.4 in · Style Q: 2.8 in
  • Release year2010 / 2012E73 Mode: 2010 · Style Q: 2012

Physical size

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

Front
E73 Mode: 113.8 × 58.4 mm 1 Style Q: 113 × 59 mm 2
Side
E73 Mode: 113.8 × 10.2 mm 1 Style Q: 113 × 10.3 mm 2
  1. 1. E73 Mode
    Height
    113.8 mm
    Width
    58.4 mm
    Depth
    10.2 mm
    Weight
    127.6 g
  2. 2. Style Q
    Height
    113 mm
    Width
    59 mm
    Depth
    10.3 mm
    Weight
    100 g
Weight

Bars start at zero and share a scale within this chart.

  1. 1. E73 Mode127.6 g

    +27.6 g versus Style Q

  2. 2. Style Q100 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

Screen size
E73 Mode: 2.4 in, 4:3, About 17.8 cm² rectangular area 1 Style Q: 2.8 in, 4:3, About 24.3 cm² rectangular area 2
  1. 1. E73 Mode 2.4 in · 4:3 About 17.8 cm² rectangular area
  2. 2. Style Q 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area

Style Q has approximately 36.1% more rectangular screen area than E73 Mode.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

E73 Mode: Original memory entry

250 MB

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

1. E73 Mode

NFC
Unknown
Headphone jack
Yes
Memory card support
See details microSD · up to 16 GB (dedicated slot) · 4 GB included

2. Style Q

NFC
Unknown
Headphone jack
Yes
Memory card support
See details microSD · up to 32 GB (dedicated slot)

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Specifications

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

1. E73 Mode2. Style Q

Everyday essentials
Everyday essentials
SpecificationE73 ModeStyle Q
Dimensions (HxWxD)
  • 113.8 Х 58.4 Х 10.2 mm
  • 113 Х 59 Х 10.3 mm
Weight
  • 127.6 g
  • 100 g
Technology
  • TFT
  • TFT
Screen size
  • 2.4" inch
  • 2.8" inch
Screen resolution
  • 320 x 240 px
  • 240 x 320 px
Internal memoryRecorded storage / RAM variants. Entries are alternatives, not a combined maximum. Ambiguous formats stay as recorded.
  • 250 MB
Unknown
Memory card support
  • microSD
  • up to 16 GB (dedicated slot)
  • 4 GB included
  • microSD
  • up to 32 GB (dedicated slot)
BatteryCapacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.
  • 1500 mAh
  • Removable Li-Po
  • 0 mAh,
Operating system OS
  • Symbian OS 9.3
  • Series 60 v3.2 UI
  • Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
Headphone jack
  • Yes
  • Yes
Display
Display
SpecificationE73 ModeStyle Q
Touchscreen Unknown
  • capacitive touchscreen
Display colors
  • 16M
  • 256K
Screen area
  • 17.8 cm2
  • 24.3 cm2
Screen format
  • 4:3 (height:width)
  • 4:3 (height:width)
Screen to body ratio
  • 26.8%
  • 36.4%
PPI /points per inch/
  • 167 PPI
  • 143 PPI
Camera and Video
Camera and Video
SpecificationE73 ModeStyle Q
Rear camera, main
  • 5 MP
  • Single
  • 3.15 MP
  • Single
Camera specs
  • 5 MP
  • AF
  • 3.15 MP
Functions
  • LED flash
Unknown
Video
  • Yes
  • Yes
Front camera, selfie
  • 0.3 MP
  • Single
  • 0.3 MP
  • Single
Specifications
  • VGA videocall camera
  • VGA
Performance
Performance
SpecificationE73 ModeStyle Q
Processor CPU Unknown
  • 600 MHz
General specs
General specs
SpecificationE73 ModeStyle Q
Release date
  • 2010
  • June
  • 2012
Colors
  • Titanium
  • Black
Historical recorded priceLegacy catalogue value; date unknown. Not a current offer.
  • 120 EUR
Unknown
Battery life
  • Stand by time- Up to 384 h (2G) / Up to 528 h (3G) Talking time- Up to 13 h (2G) / Up to 6 h (3G)
Unknown
Communication and Connectivity
Communication and Connectivity
SpecificationE73 ModeStyle Q
SIM card
  • Mini-SIM
  • Mini-SIM
Network
  • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
  • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 900 / 1800 GSM 850 / 1900
Speed
  • HSPA 10.2/2 Mbps
  • HSPA
GPRS
  • Class 32
  • Yes
Edge
  • Class 32
  • Yes
Wi-Fi
  • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g
  • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
  • hotspot
GPS
  • Yes
  • with A-GPS
  • Yes
  • with A-GPS
USB
  • microUSB 2.0
  • microUSB 2.0
Bluetooth
  • 2.0
  • A2DP
  • 2.1
  • A2DP
Harmful irradiation
  • SAR EU - 0.86 W/kg (head)
Unknown
Music and Audio
Music and Audio
SpecificationE73 ModeStyle Q
Radio
  • Stereo FM radio
  • RDS
Unknown
Other features
Other features
SpecificationE73 ModeStyle Q
Dop
  • Sensors Accelerometer
  • compass - MP4/H.263 player -MP3/WMA/WAV/eAAC+ player -Document editor (Word
  • Excel
  • PowerPoint
  • PDF) -Push to talk -Voice command/dial -Organizer -Predictive text input - Optical trackpad - For T-Mobile
  • Sensors Accelerometer
  • proximity
  • compass - MP4/H.264/WMV player -MP3/eAAC+/WMA/WAV player -Document viewer -Photo viewer/editor -Voice memo/dial -Predictive text input

Similar comparisons