Nokia E75 vs Palm Treo 750v

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE75: 15 g lighterE75: 139 g · Treo 750v: 154 g
• WidthE75: 8 mm narrowerE75: 50 mm · Treo 750v: 58 mm
• DepthE75: 7.6 mm thinnerE75: 14.4 mm · Treo 750v: 22 mm
• Release year2009 / 2006E75: 2009 · Treo 750v: 2006

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E75

   Height

   111.8 mm

   Width

   50 mm

   Depth

   14.4 mm

   Weight

   139 g

2. 2. Treo 750v

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   58 mm+8 mm versus E75

   Depth

   22 mm+7.6 mm versus E75

   Weight

   154 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E75 2.4 in · 4:3 About 17.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Treo 750v 2.5 in · 1:1 About 20.2 cm² rectangular area

Treo 750v has approximately 13% more rectangular screen area than E75.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.