Nokia E90 vs Xolo Q1000 Opus

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE90: 15.9 mm narrowerE90: 57 mm · Q1000 Opus: 72.9 mm
• Screen diagonalE90: 1 in smaller diagonalE90: 4 in · Q1000 Opus: 5 in
• DepthQ1000 Opus: 11 mm thinnerQ1000 Opus: 9 mm · E90: 20 mm
• HeightE90: 11.3 mm shorterE90: 132 mm · Q1000 Opus: 143.3 mm
• Release year2007 / 2013E90: 2007 · Q1000 Opus: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E90

   Height

   132 mm

   Width

   57 mm

   Depth

   20 mm+11 mm versus Q1000 Opus

   Weight

   210 g

2. 2. Q1000 Opus

   Height

   143.3 mm+11.3 mm versus E90

   Width

   72.9 mm+15.9 mm versus E90

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. E90 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting
2. 2. Q1000 Opus 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.