Nokia N72 vs Nokia N96

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthN72: 2 mm narrowerN72: 53 mm · N96: 55 mm
• Screen diagonalN72: 0.7 in smaller diagonalN72: 2.1 in · N96: 2.8 in
• DepthN96: 3.8 mm thinnerN96: 18 mm · N72: 21.8 mm
• HeightN96: 6 mm shorterN96: 103 mm · N72: 109 mm
• Release year2006 / 2008N72: 2006 · N96: 2008

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. N72

   Height

   109 mm+6 mm versus N96

   Width

   53 mm

   Depth

   21.8 mm+3.8 mm versus N96

   Weight

   124 g

2. 2. N96

   Height

   103 mm

   Width

   55 mm+2 mm versus N72

   Depth

   18 mm

   Weight

   125 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. N72 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting
2. 2. N96 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.