Nokia N73 vs Philips S616

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightN73: 48 g lighterN73: 116 g · S616: 164 g
• WidthN73: 22.6 mm narrowerN73: 49 mm · S616: 71.6 mm
• Screen diagonalN73: 3.1 in smaller diagonalN73: 2.4 in · S616: 5.5 in
• DepthS616: 9.2 mm thinnerS616: 9.8 mm · N73: 19 mm
• HeightN73: 33 mm shorterN73: 110 mm · S616: 143 mm
• Release year2006 / 2015N73: 2006 · S616: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. N73

   Height

   110 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   19 mm+9.2 mm versus S616

   Weight

   116 g

2. 2. S616

   Height

   143 mm+33 mm versus N73

   Width

   71.6 mm+22.6 mm versus N73

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   164 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. N73 2.4 in · 4:3 About 17.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. S616 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area

S616 has approximately 367.5% more rectangular screen area than N73.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.