Nokia Oro vs Oppo A39

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Display technologyOLED versus LCDOro: OLED · A39: LCD
• WeightOro: 15 g lighterOro: 132 g · A39: 147 g
• WidthOro: 15.4 mm narrowerOro: 57.5 mm · A39: 72.9 mm
• Screen diagonalOro: 1.7 in smaller diagonalOro: 3.5 in · A39: 5.2 in
• DepthA39: 4.5 mm thinnerA39: 7.7 mm · Oro: 12.2 mm
• HeightOro: 31.8 mm shorterOro: 117.3 mm · A39: 149.1 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Oro

   Height

   117.3 mm

   Width

   57.5 mm

   Depth

   12.2 mm+4.5 mm versus A39

   Weight

   132 g

2. 2. A39

   Height

   149.1 mm+31.8 mm versus Oro

   Width

   72.9 mm+15.4 mm versus Oro

   Depth

   7.7 mm

   Weight

   147 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Oro 3.5 in · 16:9 About 33.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. A39 5.2 in · 16:9 About 74.5 cm² rectangular area

A39 has approximately 120.7% more rectangular screen area than Oro.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.