Nokia Oro vs Philips T539

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  Nokia Oro is 10.5 mm narrower than Philips T539.

  Nokia Oro — Width: 57.5 mm. Philips T539 — Width: 68 mm.

• Screen diagonal

  The screen diagonal of Nokia Oro is 0.8 in smaller than that of Philips T539.

  Nokia Oro — Screen diagonal: 3.5 in. Philips T539 — Screen diagonal: 4.3 in.

• Depth

  Philips T539 is 1 mm thinner than Nokia Oro.

  Nokia Oro — Depth: 12.2 mm. Philips T539 — Depth: 11.2 mm.

• Height

  Nokia Oro is 13.7 mm shorter than Philips T539.

  Nokia Oro — Height: 117.3 mm. Philips T539 — Height: 131 mm.

• Release year

  The recorded release year for Nokia Oro is 2011. The recorded release year for Philips T539 is 2012.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Nokia Oro

   Height:

   117.3 mm

   Width:

   57.5 mm

   Depth:

   12.2 mm +1 mm versus Philips T539

   Weight:

   132 g

2. 2. Philips T539

   Height:

   131 mm +13.7 mm versus Nokia Oro

   Width:

   68 mm +10.5 mm versus Nokia Oro

   Depth:

   11.2 mm

   Weight:

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Nokia Oro

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   33.8 cm²

2. 2. Philips T539

   Screen diagonal:

   4.3 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   52.6 cm²

Philips T539 has approximately 55.8% more rectangular screen area than Nokia Oro.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.