Nokia Oro vs T-Mobile Pulse

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthOro: 5.5 mm narrowerOro: 57.5 mm · Pulse: 63 mm
• DepthOro: 1.3 mm thinnerOro: 12.2 mm · Pulse: 13.5 mm
• Release year2011 / 2009Oro: 2011 · Pulse: 2009

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Oro

   Height

   117.3 mm

   Width

   57.5 mm

   Depth

   12.2 mm

   Weight

   132 g

2. 2. Pulse

   Height

   116 mm

   Width

   63 mm+5.5 mm versus Oro

   Depth

   13.5 mm+1.3 mm versus Oro

   Weight

   130 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Oro 3.5 in · 16:9 About 33.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Pulse 3.5 in · 3:2 About 36.5 cm² rectangular area

Pulse has approximately 8% more rectangular screen area than Oro.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• B vs Pulse