Nokia X6 8GB vs ZTE Nova 3.5

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  X6 8GB: 8.9 mm narrower

  X6 8GB:

  51 mm

  Nova 3.5:

  59.9 mm

• Screen diagonal

  X6 8GB: 0.3 in smaller diagonal

  X6 8GB:

  3.2 in

  Nova 3.5:

  3.5 in

• Depth

  Nova 3.5: 2.8 mm thinner

  X6 8GB:

  13.8 mm

  Nova 3.5:

  11 mm

• Release year

  X6 8GB:

  2010

  Nova 3.5:

  2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. X6 8GB

   Height:

   111 mm

   Width:

   51 mm

   Depth:

   13.8 mm +2.8 mm versus Nova 3.5

   Weight:

   122 g

2. 2. Nova 3.5

   Height:

   112.4 mm

   Width:

   59.9 mm +8.9 mm versus X6 8GB

   Depth:

   11 mm

   Weight:

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. X6 8GB

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   28.2 cm²

2. 2. Nova 3.5

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   37.9 cm²

Nova 3.5 has approximately 34.4% more rectangular screen area than X6 8GB.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.