O2 Cosmo vs O2 XDA Stealth

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightCosmo: 10 g lighterCosmo: 130 g · XDA Stealth: 140 g
• WidthXDA Stealth: 9 mm narrowerXDA Stealth: 53 mm · Cosmo: 62 mm
• DepthCosmo: 9.5 mm thinnerCosmo: 13 mm · XDA Stealth: 22.5 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   62 mm+9 mm versus XDA Stealth

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   130 g

2. 2. XDA Stealth

   Height

   110 mm

   Width

   53 mm

   Depth

   22.5 mm+9.5 mm versus Cosmo

   Weight

   140 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Cosmo 2.4 in · 4:3 About 17.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. XDA Stealth 2.4 in · 4:3 About 17.8 cm² rectangular area

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.