O2 Cosmo vs Oppo Reno Ace

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Cosmo: 70 g lighter

  Cosmo:

  130 g

  Reno Ace:

  200 g

• Width

  Cosmo: 13.7 mm narrower

  Cosmo:

  62 mm

  Reno Ace:

  75.7 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Cosmo: 4.1 in smaller diagonal

  Cosmo:

  2.4 in

  Reno Ace:

  6.5 in

• Chipset

  Cosmo:

  TI OMAP 850

  Reno Ace:

  Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm)

• Rear camera layout

  Cosmo:

  Single

  Reno Ace:

  Quad

• Depth

  Reno Ace: 4.3 mm thinner

  Cosmo:

  13 mm

  Reno Ace:

  8.7 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Height:

   111 mm

   Width:

   62 mm

   Depth:

   13 mm +4.3 mm versus Reno Ace

2. 2. Reno Ace

   Height:

   161 mm +50 mm versus Cosmo

   Width:

   75.7 mm +13.7 mm versus Cosmo

   Depth:

   8.7 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Screen diagonal:

   2.4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   17.8 cm²

2. 2. Reno Ace

   Screen diagonal:

   6.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   20:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   102 cm²

Reno Ace has approximately 471.9% more rectangular screen area than Cosmo.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.