O2 Cosmo vs Plum Sync 3.5

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightSync 3.5: 37 g lighterSync 3.5: 93 g · Cosmo: 130 g
• WidthSync 3.5: 5.8 mm narrowerSync 3.5: 56.2 mm · Cosmo: 62 mm
• Screen diagonalCosmo: 1.1 in smaller diagonalCosmo: 2.4 in · Sync 3.5: 3.5 in
• ChipsetTI OMAP 850 / Mediatek MT6572M (28 nm)Cosmo: TI OMAP 850 · Sync 3.5: Mediatek MT6572M (28 nm)
• DepthSync 3.5: 3.2 mm thinnerSync 3.5: 9.8 mm · Cosmo: 13 mm
• HeightCosmo: 7.4 mm shorterCosmo: 111 mm · Sync 3.5: 118.4 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   130 g

2. 2. Sync 3.5

   Height

   118.4 mm

   Width

   56.2 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   93 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.