O2 Cosmo vs Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Cosmo: 69 g lighter

  Cosmo:

  130 g

  Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200:

  199 g

• Width

  Cosmo: 26 mm narrower

  Cosmo:

  62 mm

  Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200:

  88 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Cosmo: 3.9 in smaller diagonal

  Cosmo:

  2.4 in

  Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200:

  6.3 in

• Chipset

  Cosmo:

  TI OMAP 850

  Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200:

  Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (28 nm)

• Depth

  Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200: 5 mm thinner

  Cosmo:

  13 mm

  Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200:

  8 mm

• Height

  Cosmo: 56.6 mm shorter

  Cosmo:

  111 mm

  Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200:

  167.6 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Height:

   111 mm

   Width:

   62 mm

   Depth:

   13 mm +5 mm versus Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200

2. 2. Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200

   Height:

   167.6 mm +56.6 mm versus Cosmo

   Width:

   88 mm +26 mm versus Cosmo

   Depth:

   8 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Screen diagonal:

   2.4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   17.8 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200

   Screen diagonal:

   6.3 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   109.4 cm²

Galaxy Mega 6.3 I9200 has approximately 513.4% more rectangular screen area than Cosmo.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.