O2 Cosmo vs Sharp Aquos R2 compact

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightCosmo: 5 g lighterCosmo: 130 g · Aquos R2 compact: 135 g
• WidthCosmo: 2 mm narrowerCosmo: 62 mm · Aquos R2 compact: 64 mm
• Screen diagonalCosmo: 2.8 in smaller diagonalCosmo: 2.4 in · Aquos R2 compact: 5.2 in
• ChipsetTI OMAP 850 / Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)Cosmo: TI OMAP 850 · Aquos R2 compact: Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)
• DepthAquos R2 compact: 3.7 mm thinnerAquos R2 compact: 9.3 mm · Cosmo: 13 mm
• HeightCosmo: 20 mm shorterCosmo: 111 mm · Aquos R2 compact: 131 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   130 g

2. 2. Aquos R2 compact

   Height

   131 mm

   Width

   64 mm

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   135 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Y8p vs Aquos R2 compact