O2 Cosmo vs Sharp Aquos Xx

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightCosmo: 38 g lighterCosmo: 130 g · Aquos Xx: 168 g
• WidthCosmo: 17 mm narrowerCosmo: 62 mm · Aquos Xx: 79 mm
• Screen diagonalCosmo: 3.3 in smaller diagonalCosmo: 2.4 in · Aquos Xx: 5.7 in
• ChipsetTI OMAP 850 / Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm)Cosmo: TI OMAP 850 · Aquos Xx: Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm)
• DepthAquos Xx: 4.3 mm thinnerAquos Xx: 8.7 mm · Cosmo: 13 mm
• HeightCosmo: 35 mm shorterCosmo: 111 mm · Aquos Xx: 146 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   130 g

2. 2. Aquos Xx

   Height

   146 mm

   Width

   79 mm

   Depth

   8.7 mm

   Weight

   168 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.