O2 Cosmo vs T-Mobile Arizona

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Arizona: 30 g lighter

  Cosmo:

  130 g

  Arizona:

  100 g

• Width

  Arizona: 7 mm narrower

  Cosmo:

  62 mm

  Arizona:

  55 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Cosmo: 0.4 in smaller diagonal

  Cosmo:

  2.4 in

  Arizona:

  2.8 in

• Height

  Arizona: 7 mm shorter

  Cosmo:

  111 mm

  Arizona:

  104 mm

• Release year

  Cosmo:

  2006

  Arizona:

  2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Height:

   111 mm +7 mm versus Arizona

   Width:

   62 mm +7 mm versus Arizona

   Depth:

   13 mm

2. 2. Arizona

   Height:

   104 mm

   Width:

   55 mm

   Depth:

   12.9 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Screen diagonal:

   2.4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   17.8 cm²

2. 2. Arizona

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   24.3 cm²

Arizona has approximately 36.1% more rectangular screen area than Cosmo.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.