O2 Cosmo vs Xolo Q2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightCosmo: 50 g lighterCosmo: 130 g · Q2000: 180 g
• WidthCosmo: 15.8 mm narrowerCosmo: 62 mm · Q2000: 77.8 mm
• Screen diagonalCosmo: 3.1 in smaller diagonalCosmo: 2.4 in · Q2000: 5.5 in
• ChipsetTI OMAP 850 / Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)Cosmo: TI OMAP 850 · Q2000: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
• DepthQ2000: 3.2 mm thinnerQ2000: 9.8 mm · Cosmo: 13 mm
• HeightCosmo: 45 mm shorterCosmo: 111 mm · Q2000: 156 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   130 g

2. 2. Q2000

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   77.8 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   180 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.