O2 Cosmo vs ZTE Geek V975

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Cosmo: 18 g lighter

  Cosmo:

  130 g

  Geek V975:

  148 g

• Width

  Cosmo: 8 mm narrower

  Cosmo:

  62 mm

  Geek V975:

  70 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Cosmo: 2.6 in smaller diagonal

  Cosmo:

  2.4 in

  Geek V975:

  5 in

• Chipset

  Cosmo:

  TI OMAP 850

  Geek V975:

  Intel Atom Z2580

• Depth

  Geek V975: 3.5 mm thinner

  Cosmo:

  13 mm

  Geek V975:

  9.5 mm

• Height

  Cosmo: 34 mm shorter

  Cosmo:

  111 mm

  Geek V975:

  145 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Height:

   111 mm

   Width:

   62 mm

   Depth:

   13 mm +3.5 mm versus Geek V975

2. 2. Geek V975

   Height:

   145 mm +34 mm versus Cosmo

   Width:

   70 mm +8 mm versus Cosmo

   Depth:

   9.5 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Cosmo

   Screen diagonal:

   2.4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   17.8 cm²

2. 2. Geek V975

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

Geek V975 has approximately 286.4% more rectangular screen area than Cosmo.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.