O2 XDA Comet vs Sony Xperia M5

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  XDA Comet: 14 mm narrower

  XDA Comet:

  58 mm

  Xperia M5:

  72 mm

• Screen diagonal

  XDA Comet: 2.3 in smaller diagonal

  XDA Comet:

  2.7 in

  Xperia M5:

  5 in

• Depth

  Xperia M5: 11.4 mm thinner

  XDA Comet:

  19 mm

  Xperia M5:

  7.6 mm

• Height

  XDA Comet: 39 mm shorter

  XDA Comet:

  106 mm

  Xperia M5:

  145 mm

• Release year

  XDA Comet:

  2007

  Xperia M5:

  2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. XDA Comet

   Height:

   106 mm

   Width:

   58 mm

   Depth:

   19 mm +11.4 mm versus Xperia M5

2. 2. Xperia M5

   Height:

   145 mm +39 mm versus XDA Comet

   Width:

   72 mm +14 mm versus XDA Comet

   Depth:

   7.6 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. XDA Comet

   Screen diagonal:

   2.7 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   22.6 cm²

2. 2. Xperia M5

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

Xperia M5 has approximately 205.3% more rectangular screen area than XDA Comet.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.