You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.<
  1. Home
  2. O2 XDA mini S vs Wiko Pulp

O2 XDA mini S vs Wiko Pulp

Compare recorded specifications, size and practical differences.

Wiko Pulp

Wiko Pulp

Replace Pulp
Enter at least 3 characters. Tab to a result and press Enter to select.

    Remove Pulp
    + Add a third phone
    Enter at least 3 characters. Tab to a result and press Enter to select.

      Key differences

      Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

      • WeightPulp: 11 g lighterPulp: 149 g · XDA mini S: 160 g
      • WidthXDA mini S: 14 mm narrowerXDA mini S: 58 mm · Pulp: 72 mm
      • Screen diagonalXDA mini S: 2.2 in smaller diagonalXDA mini S: 2.8 in · Pulp: 5 in
      • ChipsetTI OMAP 850 / Mediatek MT6592M (28 nm)XDA mini S: TI OMAP 850 · Pulp: Mediatek MT6592M (28 nm)
      • DepthPulp: 14.5 mm thinnerPulp: 8.5 mm · XDA mini S: 23 mm
      • HeightXDA mini S: 35.9 mm shorterXDA mini S: 108 mm · Pulp: 143.9 mm

      Physical size

      Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

      Front
      XDA mini S: 108 × 58 mm 1 Pulp: 143.9 × 72 mm 2
      Side
      XDA mini S: 108 × 23 mm 1 Pulp: 143.9 × 8.5 mm 2
      1. 1. XDA mini S
        Height
        108 mm
        Width
        58 mm
        Depth
        23 mm+14.5 mm versus Pulp
        Weight
        160 g
      2. 2. Pulp
        Height
        143.9 mm+35.9 mm versus XDA mini S
        Width
        72 mm+14 mm versus XDA mini S
        Depth
        8.5 mm
        Weight
        149 g
      Weight

      Bars start at zero and share a scale within this chart.

      1. 1. XDA mini S160 g

        +11 g versus Pulp

      2. 2. Pulp149 g

      Screen size

      Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

      Screen size
      XDA mini S: 2.8 in, 4:3, About 24.3 cm² rectangular area 1 Pulp: 5 in, 16:9, About 68.9 cm² rectangular area 2
      1. 1. XDA mini S 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area
      2. 2. Pulp 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

      Pulp has approximately 183.9% more rectangular screen area than XDA mini S.

      Memory variants

      Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

      Recorded RAM by storage capacity and phone
      StorageXDA mini SPulp
      16 GB Unknown 2 GB RAM
      32 GB Unknown 2 GB RAM
      XDA mini S: Original memory entry

      64 MB RAM · 128 MB ROM

      Practical features

      Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

      1. XDA mini S

      NFC
      Unknown
      Headphone jack
      No
      Memory card support
      See details miniSD · up to 2 GB

      2. Pulp

      NFC
      Unknown
      Headphone jack
      Yes
      Memory card support
      See details microSD · up to 64 GB

      Battery capacity

      Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

      Recorded capacity

      Bars start at zero and share a scale within this chart.

      1. 1. XDA mini S1200 mAh
      2. 2. Pulp2500 mAh

        +1300 mAh versus XDA mini S

      Specifications

      Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

      1. XDA mini S2. Pulp

      Everyday essentials
      Everyday essentials
      SpecificationXDA mini SPulp
      Dimensions (HxWxD)
      • 108 Х 58 Х 23 mm
      • 143.9 Х 72 Х 8.5 mm
      Weight
      • 160 g
      • 149 g
      Technology
      • TFT
      • IPS LCD
      Screen size
      • 2.8" inch
      • 5" inch
      Screen resolution
      • 240 x 320 px
      • 720 x 1280 px
      Internal memoryRecorded storage / RAM variants. Entries are alternatives, not a combined maximum. Ambiguous formats stay as recorded.
      • 64 MB RAM
      • 128 MB ROM
      • 16/32 GB
      • 2 GB RAM
      Memory card support
      • miniSD
      • up to 2 GB
      • microSD
      • up to 64 GB
      BatteryCapacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.
      • 1200 mAh
      • Removable Li-Po
      • 2500 mAh
      • Li-Po
      Operating system OS
      • Microsoft Windows Mobile 5.0 PocketPC
      • Android 5.1 (Lollipop)
      Chipset
      • TI OMAP 850
      • Mediatek MT6592M (28 nm)
      Headphone jack
      • No
      • Yes
      Display
      Display
      SpecificationXDA mini SPulp
      Touchscreen
      • resistive touchscreen
      • capacitive touchscreen
      Display colors
      • 65K
      • 16M
      Screen area
      • 24.3 cm2
      • 68.9 cm2
      Screen format
      • 4:3 (height:width)
      • 16:9 (height:width)
      Screen to body ratio
      • 38.8%
      • 66.5%
      PPI /points per inch/
      • 143 PPI
      • 294 PPI
      Camera and Video
      Camera and Video
      SpecificationXDA mini SPulp
      Rear camera, main
      • 1.3 MP
      • Single
      • 13 MP
      • Single
      Camera specs
      • 1.3 MP
      • 13 MP
      • AF
      Functions
      • LED flash
      • LED flash
      Video
      • Yes
      • 1080p@30fps
      Front camera, selfie
      • 0 MP,
      • 5 MP
      • Single
      Specifications Unknown
      • 5 MP
      Performance
      Performance
      SpecificationXDA mini SPulp
      Processor CPU
      • 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S
      • Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7
      Graphics processor GPU Unknown
      • Mali-450MP4
      Antutu 7 scoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied. Unknown
      • 23587
      GeekBench 4 Single CoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied. Unknown
      • 433
      GeekBench 4 Multi-CoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied. Unknown
      • 2116
      General specs
      General specs
      SpecificationXDA mini SPulp
      Release date
      • 2005
      • Q3
      • 2015
      • November
      Colors
      • Silver
      • Black
      • White
      • Chocolate
      • Electric Blue
      • Flashy Red
      Battery life
      • Stand by time- Up to 200 h Talking time- Up to 5 h
      • Stand by time- Up to 240 h (2G) / Up to 240 h (3G) Talking time- Up to 26 h (2G) / Up to 17 h (3G)
      Communication and Connectivity
      Communication and Connectivity
      SpecificationXDA mini SPulp
      SIM card
      • Mini-SIM
      • Dual SIM (Micro-SIM
      • dual stand-by)
      Network Unknown
      • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
      Speed Unknown
      • HSPA 21.1/11.5 Mbps
      GPRS
      • Class 10
      • Up to 107 kbps
      Edge
      • Yes
      • Up to 296 kbps
      Wi-Fi
      • Wi-Fi 802.11b/g
      • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
      • Wi-Fi Direct
      • hotspot
      GPS
      • No
      • Yes
      • with A-GPS
      USB
      • miniUSB
      • microUSB 2.0
      • USB Host
      Bluetooth
      • 2.0
      • 4.0
      • A2DP
      Harmful irradiation Unknown
      • SAR EU - 0.33 W/kg (head) 0.46 W/kg (body)
      Music and Audio
      Music and Audio
      SpecificationXDA mini SPulp
      Radio
      • No
      • FM radio
      Other features
      Other features
      SpecificationXDA mini SPulp
      Dop
      • Infrared port - Microsoft ActiveSync -Pocket Office -MP3/AAC player -Predictive text input - Produced by HTC. Functionally identical to Qtek 9100
      • i-mate K-JAM
      • T-Mobile MDA Vario
      • Sensors Accelerometer
      • gyro
      • proximity
      • compass - For Europe

      Similar comparisons