O2 XDA Orbit vs Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  XDA Orbit: 7.2 mm narrower

  XDA Orbit:

  58 mm

  Galaxy A3 (2016):

  65.2 mm

• Screen diagonal

  XDA Orbit: 1.9 in smaller diagonal

  XDA Orbit:

  2.8 in

  Galaxy A3 (2016):

  4.7 in

• Chipset

  XDA Orbit:

  TI OMAP 850

  Galaxy A3 (2016):

  Exynos 7578 -Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm)

• Depth

  Galaxy A3 (2016): 9.5 mm thinner

  XDA Orbit:

  16.8 mm

  Galaxy A3 (2016):

  7.3 mm

• Height

  XDA Orbit: 26.5 mm shorter

  XDA Orbit:

  108 mm

  Galaxy A3 (2016):

  134.5 mm

• Release year

  XDA Orbit:

  2006

  Galaxy A3 (2016):

  2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. XDA Orbit

   Height:

   108 mm

   Width:

   58 mm

   Depth:

   16.8 mm +9.5 mm versus Galaxy A3 (2016)

2. 2. Galaxy A3 (2016)

   Height:

   134.5 mm +26.5 mm versus XDA Orbit

   Width:

   65.2 mm +7.2 mm versus XDA Orbit

   Depth:

   7.3 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. XDA Orbit

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   24.3 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy A3 (2016)

   Screen diagonal:

   4.7 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   60.9 cm²

Galaxy A3 (2016) has approximately 150.8% more rectangular screen area than XDA Orbit.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.