O2 XDA vs Samsung Galaxy Star Pro S7260

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260: 80 g lighter

  XDA:

  201 g

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260:

  121 g

• Width

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260: 10.3 mm narrower

  XDA:

  73 mm

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260:

  62.7 mm

• Screen diagonal

  XDA: 0.5 in smaller diagonal

  XDA:

  3.5 in

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260:

  4 in

• Depth

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260: 7.4 mm thinner

  XDA:

  18 mm

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260:

  10.6 mm

• Height

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260: 7.8 mm shorter

  XDA:

  129 mm

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260:

  121.2 mm

• Release year

  XDA:

  2003

  Galaxy Star Pro S7260:

  2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. XDA

   Height:

   129 mm +7.8 mm versus Galaxy Star Pro S7260

   Width:

   73 mm +10.3 mm versus Galaxy Star Pro S7260

   Depth:

   18 mm +7.4 mm versus Galaxy Star Pro S7260

2. 2. Galaxy Star Pro S7260

   Height:

   121.2 mm

   Width:

   62.7 mm

   Depth:

   10.6 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. XDA

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   37.9 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy Star Pro S7260

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

Galaxy Star Pro S7260 has approximately 20% more rectangular screen area than XDA.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.