O2 XDA vs Sony Ericsson Aspen

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Aspen: 71 g lighter

  XDA:

  201 g

  Aspen:

  130 g

• Width

  Aspen: 13 mm narrower

  XDA:

  73 mm

  Aspen:

  60 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Aspen: 1.1 in smaller diagonal

  XDA:

  3.5 in

  Aspen:

  2.4 in

• Depth

  Aspen: 5.5 mm thinner

  XDA:

  18 mm

  Aspen:

  12.5 mm

• Height

  Aspen: 12 mm shorter

  XDA:

  129 mm

  Aspen:

  117 mm

• Release year

  XDA:

  2003

  Aspen:

  2010

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. XDA

   Height:

   129 mm +12 mm versus Aspen

   Width:

   73 mm +13 mm versus Aspen

   Depth:

   18 mm +5.5 mm versus Aspen

2. 2. Aspen

   Height:

   117 mm

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   12.5 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. XDA

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   37.9 cm²

2. 2. Aspen

   Screen diagonal:

   2.4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   17.8 cm²

XDA has approximately 112.7% more rectangular screen area than Aspen.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.