O2 XDA vs Xiaomi Redmi 3x

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Redmi 3x: 57 g lighter

  XDA:

  201 g

  Redmi 3x:

  144 g

• Width

  Redmi 3x: 3.4 mm narrower

  XDA:

  73 mm

  Redmi 3x:

  69.6 mm

• Screen diagonal

  XDA: 1.5 in smaller diagonal

  XDA:

  3.5 in

  Redmi 3x:

  5 in

• Depth

  Redmi 3x: 9.5 mm thinner

  XDA:

  18 mm

  Redmi 3x:

  8.5 mm

• Height

  XDA: 10.3 mm shorter

  XDA:

  129 mm

  Redmi 3x:

  139.3 mm

• Release year

  XDA:

  2003

  Redmi 3x:

  2016

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. XDA

   Height:

   129 mm

   Width:

   73 mm +3.4 mm versus Redmi 3x

   Depth:

   18 mm +9.5 mm versus Redmi 3x

2. 2. Redmi 3x

   Height:

   139.3 mm +10.3 mm versus XDA

   Width:

   69.6 mm

   Depth:

   8.5 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. XDA

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   37.9 cm²

2. 2. Redmi 3x

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

Redmi 3x has approximately 81.7% more rectangular screen area than XDA.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.