O2 XDA vs ZTE Zmax Pro

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Zmax Pro: 26.1 g lighter

  XDA:

  201 g

  Zmax Pro:

  174.9 g

• Width

  XDA: 10.8 mm narrower

  XDA:

  73 mm

  Zmax Pro:

  83.8 mm

• Screen diagonal

  XDA: 2.5 in smaller diagonal

  XDA:

  3.5 in

  Zmax Pro:

  6 in

• Depth

  Zmax Pro: 9.1 mm thinner

  XDA:

  18 mm

  Zmax Pro:

  8.9 mm

• Height

  XDA: 36.1 mm shorter

  XDA:

  129 mm

  Zmax Pro:

  165.1 mm

• Release year

  XDA:

  2003

  Zmax Pro:

  2016

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. XDA

   Height:

   129 mm

   Width:

   73 mm

   Depth:

   18 mm +9.1 mm versus Zmax Pro

2. 2. Zmax Pro

   Height:

   165.1 mm +36.1 mm versus XDA

   Width:

   83.8 mm +10.8 mm versus XDA

   Depth:

   8.9 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. XDA

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   37.9 cm²

2. 2. Zmax Pro

   Screen diagonal:

   6 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   99.2 cm²

Zmax Pro has approximately 161.6% more rectangular screen area than XDA.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.