Oppo A39 vs Philips V900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightA39: 6.5 g lighterA39: 147 g · V900: 153.5 g
• WidthV900: 10.5 mm narrowerV900: 62.4 mm · A39: 72.9 mm
• Screen diagonalV900: 1.7 in smaller diagonalV900: 3.5 in · A39: 5.2 in
• DepthA39: 5.5 mm thinnerA39: 7.7 mm · V900: 13.2 mm
• HeightV900: 34.1 mm shorterV900: 115 mm · A39: 149.1 mm
• Release year2017 / 2010A39: 2017 · V900: 2010

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A39

   Height

   149.1 mm+34.1 mm versus V900

   Width

   72.9 mm+10.5 mm versus V900

   Depth

   7.7 mm

   Weight

   147 g

2. 2. V900

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   62.4 mm

   Depth

   13.2 mm+5.5 mm versus A39

   Weight

   153.5 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. A39 5.2 in · 16:9 About 74.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. V900 3.5 in · 5:3 About 34.9 cm² rectangular area

A39 has approximately 113.8% more rectangular screen area than V900.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.