Oppo A53 vs Philips V808

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightV808: 45 g lighterV808: 120 g · A53: 165 g
• WidthV808: 16 mm narrowerV808: 61 mm · A53: 77 mm
• Screen diagonalV808: 2.3 in smaller diagonalV808: 3.2 in · A53: 5.5 in
• DepthA53: 6.6 mm thinnerA53: 7.4 mm · V808: 14 mm
• HeightV808: 38 mm shorterV808: 115 mm · A53: 153 mm
• Release year2015 / 2009A53: 2015 · V808: 2009

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A53

   Height

   153 mm+38 mm versus V808

   Width

   77 mm+16 mm versus V808

   Depth

   7.4 mm

   Weight

   165 g

2. 2. V808

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   61 mm

   Depth

   14 mm+6.6 mm versus A53

   Weight

   120 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. A53 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. V808 3.2 in · 3:2 About 30.5 cm² rectangular area

A53 has approximately 173.5% more rectangular screen area than V808.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• A68 vs A53