Oppo Find vs Philips S309

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthS309: 1.3 mm narrowerS309: 64.7 mm · Find: 66 mm
• Screen diagonalS309: 0.3 in smaller diagonalS309: 4 in · Find: 4.3 in
• DepthFind: 4.1 mm thinnerFind: 6.7 mm · S309: 10.8 mm
• HeightFind: 2.6 mm shorterFind: 125 mm · S309: 127.6 mm
• Release year2012 / 2015Find: 2012 · S309: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Find

   Height

   125 mm

   Width

   66 mm+1.3 mm versus S309

   Depth

   6.7 mm

   Weight

   125 g

2. 2. S309

   Height

   127.6 mm+2.6 mm versus Find

   Width

   64.7 mm

   Depth

   10.8 mm+4.1 mm versus Find

   Weight

   127 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Find 4.3 in · 5:3 About 52.6 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. S309 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area

Find has approximately 15.6% more rectangular screen area than S309.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.