Oppo Neo vs Plum Axe Plus

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightAxe Plus: 18 g lighterAxe Plus: 112 g · Neo: 130 g
• Screen diagonalAxe Plus: 0.5 in smaller diagonalAxe Plus: 4 in · Neo: 4.5 in
• DepthNeo: 0.7 mm thinnerNeo: 9.2 mm · Axe Plus: 9.9 mm
• HeightAxe Plus: 3 mm shorterAxe Plus: 129 mm · Neo: 132 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Neo

   Height

   132 mm+3 mm versus Axe Plus

   Width

   65.8 mm

   Depth

   9.2 mm

   Weight

   130 g

2. 2. Axe Plus

   Height

   129 mm

   Width

   65.1 mm

   Depth

   9.9 mm+0.7 mm versus Neo

   Weight

   112 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Neo 4.5 in · 5:3 About 57.6 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Axe Plus 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area

Neo has approximately 26.6% more rectangular screen area than Axe Plus.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.