Oppo Neo vs ZTE PF200

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Depth

  PF200: 0.7 mm thinner

  Neo:

  9.2 mm

  PF200:

  8.5 mm

• Height

  PF200: 2 mm shorter

  Neo:

  132 mm

  PF200:

  130 mm

• Release year

  Neo:

  2014

  PF200:

  2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Neo

   Height:

   132 mm +2 mm versus PF200

   Width:

   65.8 mm

   Depth:

   9.2 mm +0.7 mm versus PF200

   Weight:

   130 g

2. 2. PF200

   Height:

   130 mm

   Width:

   66 mm

   Depth:

   8.5 mm

   Weight:

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Neo

   Screen diagonal:

   4.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   57.6 cm²

2. 2. PF200

   Screen diagonal:

   4.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   55.8 cm²

Neo has approximately 3.2% more rectangular screen area than PF200.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.