Oppo T29 vs Philips D833

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonalD833: 0.2 in smaller diagonalD833: 4.3 in · T29: 4.5 in
• DepthT29: 1.6 mm thinnerT29: 10.5 mm · D833: 12.1 mm
• HeightD833: 3.5 mm shorterD833: 128 mm · T29: 131.5 mm
• Release year2012 / 2013T29: 2012 · D833: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. T29

   Height

   131.5 mm+3.5 mm versus D833

   Width

   67 mm

   Depth

   10.5 mm

   Weight

   160 g

2. 2. D833

   Height

   128 mm

   Width

   67.3 mm

   Depth

   12.1 mm+1.6 mm versus T29

   Weight

   163 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. T29 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. D833 4.3 in · 5:3 About 52.6 cm² rectangular area

T29 has approximately 6.1% more rectangular screen area than D833.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Q60 vs T29