Orange Hiro vs Xolo Q1011

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthHiro: 10.2 mm narrowerHiro: 62 mm · Q1011: 72.2 mm
• Screen diagonalHiro: 0.7 in smaller diagonalHiro: 4.3 in · Q1011: 5 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6572 (28 nm) / Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm)Hiro: Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm) · Q1011: Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm)
• HeightHiro: 16.5 mm shorterHiro: 127.1 mm · Q1011: 143.6 mm
• Release year2013 / 2014Hiro: 2013 · Q1011: 2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Hiro

   Height

   127.1 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   8 mm

   Weight

   96 g

2. 2. Q1011

   Height

   143.6 mm+16.5 mm versus Hiro

   Width

   72.2 mm+10.2 mm versus Hiro

   Depth

   8.3 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Hiro 4.3 in · 16:9 About 51 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Q1011 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Q1011 has approximately 35.2% more rectangular screen area than Hiro.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.