Palm Treo 600 vs Samsung Galaxy Pro B7510

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Galaxy Pro B7510: 64.6 g lighter

  Treo 600:

  168 g

  Galaxy Pro B7510:

  103.4 g

• Width

  Treo 600: 6.7 mm narrower

  Treo 600:

  60 mm

  Galaxy Pro B7510:

  66.7 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Treo 600: 0.3 in smaller diagonal

  Treo 600:

  2.5 in

  Galaxy Pro B7510:

  2.8 in

• Depth

  Galaxy Pro B7510: 11.3 mm thinner

  Treo 600:

  22 mm

  Galaxy Pro B7510:

  10.7 mm

• Height

  Galaxy Pro B7510: 3.4 mm shorter

  Treo 600:

  112 mm

  Galaxy Pro B7510:

  108.6 mm

• Release year

  Treo 600:

  2003

  Galaxy Pro B7510:

  2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Treo 600

   Height:

   112 mm +3.4 mm versus Galaxy Pro B7510

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   22 mm +11.3 mm versus Galaxy Pro B7510

2. 2. Galaxy Pro B7510

   Height:

   108.6 mm

   Width:

   66.7 mm +6.7 mm versus Treo 600

   Depth:

   10.7 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Treo 600

   Screen diagonal:

   2.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   1:1

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   20.2 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy Pro B7510

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   24.3 cm²

Galaxy Pro B7510 has approximately 20.4% more rectangular screen area than Treo 600.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.