Palm Treo 600 vs Spice Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358)

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358): 38 g lighter

  Treo 600:

  168 g

  Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358):

  130 g

• Screen diagonal

  Treo 600: 1 in smaller diagonal

  Treo 600:

  2.5 in

  Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358):

  3.5 in

• Chipset

  Treo 600:

  TI OMAP 1510

  Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358):

  Mediatek MT6571 (28 nm)

• Depth

  Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358): 11.2 mm thinner

  Treo 600:

  22 mm

  Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358):

  10.8 mm

• Height

  Treo 600: 6 mm shorter

  Treo 600:

  112 mm

  Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358):

  118 mm

• Release year

  Treo 600:

  2003

  Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358):

  2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Treo 600

   Height:

   112 mm

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   22 mm +11.2 mm versus Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358)

2. 2. Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358)

   Height:

   118 mm +6 mm versus Treo 600

   Width:

   60.4 mm

   Depth:

   10.8 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Treo 600

   Screen diagonal:

   2.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   1:1

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   20.2 cm²

2. 2. Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358)

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   36.5 cm²

Smart Flo 358 (Mi-358) has approximately 80.9% more rectangular screen area than Treo 600.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.