Palm Treo 600 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  Treo 600: 16 mm narrower

  Treo 600:

  60 mm

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  76 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Treo 600: 3 in smaller diagonal

  Treo 600:

  2.5 in

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  5.5 in

• Chipset

  Treo 600:

  TI OMAP 1510

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  Mediatek MT6795 Helio X10 (28 nm)

• Depth

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek): 13.3 mm thinner

  Treo 600:

  22 mm

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  8.7 mm

• Height

  Treo 600: 38 mm shorter

  Treo 600:

  112 mm

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  150 mm

• Release year

  Treo 600:

  2003

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Treo 600

   Height:

   112 mm

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   22 mm +13.3 mm versus Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

2. 2. Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

   Height:

   150 mm +38 mm versus Treo 600

   Width:

   76 mm +16 mm versus Treo 600

   Depth:

   8.7 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Treo 600

   Screen diagonal:

   2.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   1:1

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   20.2 cm²

2. 2. Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) has approximately 313.6% more rectangular screen area than Treo 600.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.