Pantech Pocket P9060 vs Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Pocket P9060: 49.9 g lighter

  Pocket P9060:

  132.1 g

  Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150:

  182 g

• Width

  Pocket P9060: 4.4 mm narrower

  Pocket P9060:

  78 mm

  Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150:

  82.4 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Pocket P9060: 1.8 in smaller diagonal

  Pocket P9060:

  4 in

  Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150:

  5.8 in

• Depth

  Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150: 2.3 mm thinner

  Pocket P9060:

  11.3 mm

  Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150:

  9 mm

• Height

  Pocket P9060: 47.9 mm shorter

  Pocket P9060:

  114.7 mm

  Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150:

  162.6 mm

• Release year

  Pocket P9060:

  2011

  Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150:

  2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Pocket P9060

   Height:

   114.7 mm

   Width:

   78 mm

   Depth:

   11.3 mm +2.3 mm versus Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150

2. 2. Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150

   Height:

   162.6 mm +47.9 mm versus Pocket P9060

   Width:

   82.4 mm +4.4 mm versus Pocket P9060

   Depth:

   9 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Pocket P9060

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   49.5 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150

   Screen diagonal:

   5.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   92.7 cm²

Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9150 has approximately 87.2% more rectangular screen area than Pocket P9060.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.