Philips V808 vs ZTE U900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonalV808: 0.3 in smaller diagonalV808: 3.2 in · U900: 3.5 in
• Release year2009 / 2011V808: 2009 · U900: 2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. V808

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   61 mm

   Depth

   14 mm

   Weight

   120 g

2. 2. U900

   Height

   Unknown

   Width

   Unknown

   Depth

   Unknown

   Weight

   Unknown

   Unavailable dimensions are omitted from the drawing.

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. V808 3.2 in · 3:2 About 30.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. U900 3.5 in · 5:3 About 34.9 cm² rectangular area

U900 has approximately 14.4% more rectangular screen area than V808.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.