Philips V900 vs TECNO Camon X

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthV900: 13.4 mm narrowerV900: 62.4 mm · Camon X: 75.8 mm
• Screen diagonalV900: 2.5 in smaller diagonalV900: 3.5 in · Camon X: 6 in
• DepthCamon X: 8 mm thinnerCamon X: 5.2 mm · V900: 13.2 mm
• HeightV900: 43.6 mm shorterV900: 115 mm · Camon X: 158.6 mm
• Release year2010 / 2018V900: 2010 · Camon X: 2018

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. V900

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   62.4 mm

   Depth

   13.2 mm+8 mm versus Camon X

   Weight

   153.5 g

2. 2. Camon X

   Height

   158.6 mm+43.6 mm versus V900

   Width

   75.8 mm+13.4 mm versus V900

   Depth

   5.2 mm

   Weight

   149 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. V900 3.5 in · 5:3 About 34.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Camon X 6 in · 18:9 About 92.9 cm² rectangular area

Camon X has approximately 166.4% more rectangular screen area than V900.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.