Philips W626 vs Sharp Aquos V

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightW626: 71 g lighterW626: 102 g · Aquos V: 173 g
• WidthW626: 14 mm narrowerW626: 62 mm · Aquos V: 76 mm
• Screen diagonalW626: 2.4 in smaller diagonalW626: 3.5 in · Aquos V: 5.9 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6573 (65 nm) / Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm)W626: Mediatek MT6573 (65 nm) · Aquos V: Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm)
• Rear camera layoutSingle / DualW626: Single · Aquos V: Dual
• DepthAquos V: 5.3 mm thinnerAquos V: 9 mm · W626: 14.3 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. W626

   Height

   116 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   14.3 mm

   Weight

   102 g

2. 2. Aquos V

   Height

   157 mm

   Width

   76 mm

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   173 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.